<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Backpacking Photography Equipment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/08/26/thoughts-on-my-summer-2007-backpacking-photography-kit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/08/26/thoughts-on-my-summer-2007-backpacking-photography-kit</link>
	<description>Daily photographs, news, observations, and ideas about photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Dan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/08/26/thoughts-on-my-summer-2007-backpacking-photography-kit/comment-page-1#comment-38304</link>
		<dc:creator>G Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/08/26/thoughts-on-my-summer-2007-backpacking-photography-kit/#comment-38304</guid>
		<description>Bret, it really does sound like you and I use almost exactly the same approach, aside from a few minor differences in specific lenses and so forth. The keys are:

1. We&#039;re both using the 24-105 as the &quot;standard&quot; lens, partly because it can work for a wide range of opportunities from tripod-based stuff to &quot;grab the camera from the front load pack and make the shot&quot; stuff. The ability to pull that camera/lens combo out of the chest pack and shoot quickly has turned out to be very useful for me on many occasions.

2. We use pretty much the same chest-mount pack for the camera. I&#039;ve also found  that I can attach the Lowepro lens bags that I use for the 17-40 and the 70-200 to the sides of this bag and sling the whole thing over my shoulder when I&#039;m shooting around camp in the evenings.

3. Our tripod solutions also sound very similar. I think I may be using a slightly taller tripod, but I can see going in different directions on that issue. We both use that fine Acratech bullhead. It is really a fine piece of equipment and not only on the trail.

4. Like you, I also carry the &quot;extra&quot; lenses (typically a 17-40 and a 70-200) inside the main backpack on the trail.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret, it really does sound like you and I use almost exactly the same approach, aside from a few minor differences in specific lenses and so forth. The keys are:</p>
<p>1. We&#8217;re both using the 24-105 as the &#8220;standard&#8221; lens, partly because it can work for a wide range of opportunities from tripod-based stuff to &#8220;grab the camera from the front load pack and make the shot&#8221; stuff. The ability to pull that camera/lens combo out of the chest pack and shoot quickly has turned out to be very useful for me on many occasions.</p>
<p>2. We use pretty much the same chest-mount pack for the camera. I&#8217;ve also found  that I can attach the Lowepro lens bags that I use for the 17-40 and the 70-200 to the sides of this bag and sling the whole thing over my shoulder when I&#8217;m shooting around camp in the evenings.</p>
<p>3. Our tripod solutions also sound very similar. I think I may be using a slightly taller tripod, but I can see going in different directions on that issue. We both use that fine Acratech bullhead. It is really a fine piece of equipment and not only on the trail.</p>
<p>4. Like you, I also carry the &#8220;extra&#8221; lenses (typically a 17-40 and a 70-200) inside the main backpack on the trail.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

