<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lens Protection: Ultraviolet (UV) Filter or Lens Cap and Hood?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/12/27/uv-filter-or-not/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/12/27/uv-filter-or-not</link>
	<description>Daily photographs, news, observations, and ideas about photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff hobson</title>
		<link>http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/12/27/uv-filter-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-37742</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff hobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2007/12/27/uv-filter-or-not/#comment-37742</guid>
		<description>Wonderful information here. A great discussion, that I have thought about for some time now. I have a cheaper uv filter on a 28-105 lens I have, and it is never as sharp as it should be. My tokina 11-16 is razor sharp and has no uv filter. After reading this I am going to take my uv filter off. Thanks Dan for the awesome discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful information here. A great discussion, that I have thought about for some time now. I have a cheaper uv filter on a 28-105 lens I have, and it is never as sharp as it should be. My tokina 11-16 is razor sharp and has no uv filter. After reading this I am going to take my uv filter off. Thanks Dan for the awesome discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

