<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I Sharpen &#8211; A Quick Overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2009/10/15/how-i-sharpen-a-quick-overview/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2009/10/15/how-i-sharpen-a-quick-overview</link>
	<description>A daily photograph, news, observations, and ideas about photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G Dan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.gdanmitchell.com/2009/10/15/how-i-sharpen-a-quick-overview/comment-page-1#comment-15220</link>
		<dc:creator>G Dan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gdanmitchell.com/?p=5220#comment-15220</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting, Tedd.

I&#039;m afraid that I haven&#039;t used Aperture for quite a while now. I&#039;m an &quot;Apple Distinguished Educator,&quot; and as such I had access to earlier versions of the app - but the computer I was using at that time was not up to the processor requirements of Aperture. I wouldn&#039;t have that issue today, but I think I&#039;ve made my choice to go with the Adobe products at this point. 

It is my impression that the sharpening in LR is pretty darn good - and the various controls and the ability to mask really help. You can do pretty much the same thing in ACR, but I&#039;d say that the interface for sharpening is probably a bit more friendly in LR.

One thing that may make my situation a bit different from that of some other photographers is that I tend to do a lot of post-processing work on a small number of images - rather than doing minor tweaks on very large numbers of images. I&#039;m pretty certain that a program like Aperture or LR would be my choice for that latter, but - at least as far as I know - they won&#039;t quite &quot;do that.&quot;

Take care,

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting, Tedd.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that I haven&#8217;t used Aperture for quite a while now. I&#8217;m an &#8220;Apple Distinguished Educator,&#8221; and as such I had access to earlier versions of the app &#8211; but the computer I was using at that time was not up to the processor requirements of Aperture. I wouldn&#8217;t have that issue today, but I think I&#8217;ve made my choice to go with the Adobe products at this point. </p>
<p>It is my impression that the sharpening in LR is pretty darn good &#8211; and the various controls and the ability to mask really help. You can do pretty much the same thing in ACR, but I&#8217;d say that the interface for sharpening is probably a bit more friendly in LR.</p>
<p>One thing that may make my situation a bit different from that of some other photographers is that I tend to do a lot of post-processing work on a small number of images &#8211; rather than doing minor tweaks on very large numbers of images. I&#8217;m pretty certain that a program like Aperture or LR would be my choice for that latter, but &#8211; at least as far as I know &#8211; they won&#8217;t quite &#8220;do that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.590 seconds -->
